Promethee Algorithm in Assessing Lecturer Performance

Fatkhurrochman Fatkhurrochman; Wahyu Priyoatmoko; Sugeng Wahyudiono

doi:10.29040/ijcis.v3i2.71

Promethee Algorithm in Assessing Lecturer Performance

Fatkhurrochman Fatkhurrochman, Wahyu Priyoatmoko, Sugeng Wahyudiono

Abstract

Higher Education is an educational institution that plays a role in producing quality human resources. The roles, duties and responsibilities of lecturers are very important in educating the nation's life and national goals. There are many problems that cause the performance of lecturers at universities in Indonesia. Meanwhile, lecturers are required to give good performance. In this case, the researcher is interested in evaluating the performance of lecturers using the promethee method. The promethee method is able to produce decisions based on comparisons between alternatives according to the preference function and the different weights of each criterion. The criteria used in the assessment of lecturer performance are 10 criteria with 7 alternative lecturers. The Promethee method produces recommendations for lecturers with the best performance, namely Lecturer E who has a net flow value of 0.12153. While the lecturer with the lowest performance assessment is Lecturer B with a net flow value of -0.19167. The results of the decisions given by the promethee method can help provide an assessment of the lecturer's performance from the several alternatives given. So as to be able to produce an objective recommendation decision

Full Text:

PDF

References

Z. Yahya and F. Hidayati, “Analisis Kompetensi Terhadap Penilaian Kinerja Dosen (Studi Kasus Dosen UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau),” Jurnal Penelitian Keagamaan, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 104–128, 2014

I. A. Permana, “Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Balance Scorecard (Studi Kasus STT Sangkakala),” Jurnal Riset ekonomi dan Bisnis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 89–99, 2020

E. Erdawati, A. Linarta, S. Adrianto, and P. Yunita, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Dosen Berkualitas di STMIK Dumai Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Jurnal Informatika, Manajemen dan Komputer, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 55–63, 2016.

F. Fatkhurrochman, K. Kusrini, and hanif Alfatta, “Implementation of TOPSIS Algorithm for Evaluating Lecturer Performance,” International Journal Artificial Intelligent and Informatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2018.

M. Laia, P. Laia, and W. I. Safitri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Penilaian Dosen Menerapkan Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” in Seminar Nasional Sains & Teknologi Informasi (SENSASI) , 2018, pp. 130–134. [Online]. Available: http://seminar-id.com/semnas-sensasi2018.htmlPage|130

B. Damanik and M. Bangun, “Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen Univ.Sari Mutiara Indonesia dengan Menggunakan Metode Preference Ranking Organization Method For Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE),” Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science (CESS), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2502–714, 2018.

Y. handoko Agustin and H. Kurniawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product (Studi Kasus : STMIK Pontianak),” in Seminar Nasional Informatika, 2015, pp. 177–182.

N. A. Y. Putri, R. T. Subagio, and M. Asfi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Mahasiswa KIP Kuliah dengan Penerapan Metode TOPSIS dan PROMETHEE,” Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1394–1404, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i4.3268.

A. Guntur, I. Sudahri Damanik, and M. Fauzan, “Algoritma Promethee II Dalam Seleksi Anggota Paskibra Baru Pada SMA Negeri 4 Pematangsiantar,” Jurnal Riset sistem Informasi dan teknik Informatika (JURASIK), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 189–198, 2021.

E. L. Amalia and D. S. Horma, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Promethee,” in Posiding Setrinov, 2017, pp. 34–43.

A. Syaputra and S. Sasmita, “Implementasi Algoritma Promethee II Pada Pemilihan Media Belajar Daring Di Era Pandemi Covid-19,” Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 340–345, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i3.1290.

T. Imandasari, A. Wanto, and A. P. Windarto, “Analisis Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Mahasiswa PKL Menggunakan Metode PROMETHEE,” Jurnal Riset Komputer (JURIKOM), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 234–239, 2018.

R. S. Nuraini, R. N. Shofa, and C. M. Sidik, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Algoritma Promethee (Studi Kasus: SMP Negeri 1 Singaparna),” Scientific Articles of Informatics Students, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 2018.

S. R. Ningsih and A. Perdana Windarto, “Penerapan Metode Promethee Ii Pada Dosen Penerima Hibah P2m Internal,” Jurnal Nasional Informatika dan Teknologi Jaringan, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 20–25, 2018.

S. R. Handayani and B. Noranita, “Penerapan Metode Promethee Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Penerima Kredit,” Jurnal Masyarakat Informatika (JMASIF), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2018, Accessed: Jun. 18, 2022.

L. V. Aprilian, M. Y. H. Setyawan, and M. H. K. Saputra, Memahami Metode Omax dan Promethee pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. bandung: CV. Kreatif Industri Nusantara, 2020.

T. Novika, A. Widiastri, V. miralda, and A. P. Windarto, “SPK: Analisa Rekomendasi Bank Konvensional Dengan Promethee Sebagai Solusi Cerdas untuk Menabung,” JUSIM (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Musirawas), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2018.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29040/ijcis.v3i2.71